Which policy are you referring to that implies they don’t?
Also I think you are assuming they store query logs and then aggregate this data later. It is much simpler just to maintain an integer counter for monitoring as the queries come in, and ingest that into a time series database (not sure if that’s what they actually do). Maybe it needs to be a bit fancier to handle the cardinality of DNS names dimension, but re-constructing this from logs would be much more expensive.
If an organization is going to be this specific about what they count, it implies that this is everything they count, not that there may also be other junk unmentioned.
EDIT: I see they went out of their way to say "this is the complete list of everything we count" and they did not include counters by label, so I see your point!
That said, I think it's entirely reasonable for them to log domains alone if they're completely disconnected from any user activity, i.e. a simple "increment the counter for foo.com" is reasonable since that's unrelated to user privacy.
Just for fun I have added some of these into my cron job.