Hacker News Reader

It's fucking nuts because it's worse than that too.

Fujitsu falsely claimed that they couldn't remotely modify data.

They used technical info to obfuscate things for the accused and the judges.

I haven’t followed this issue closely but would lying in court about their ability to remotely modify data not be perjury?

Many people committed perjury. Many barristers advised their clients to perjure themselves. Many executives within the post office and at Fujitsu conspired to deceive the courts. Many prosecutors submitted evidence to the courts they knew to be fraudulent.

The only people who received criminal charges were the sub postmasters.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com