We should not just focus on the location. It's about who is managing the servers and networks.
We should not just focus on the location. It's about who is managing the servers and networks.
True, but location matters a great deal, because some countries have a tendency to MITM any physical link they can get their hands on, even if that means scuba divers or secret rooms. But also who it is who is managing it, agree.
The same countries have physical access to links in other countries, through agreements.
https://siliconangle.com/2023/08/18/suse-taken-private-major...
Now that they are completely disentangled again, let's hope they restore the popularity. It is a good distribution.
It wasn't the takeover, it was splitting SUSE linux into a paid stable/supported distro and a testing/community distro, like Red Hat had just done with RHEL/Fedora. Unlike Red Hat, SUSE didn't have the critical mass to force the community to be guinea pigs for paid customers, and it withered as folk switched to other distros, including the hot new entrant: ubuntu.