Hacker News Reader

Comment by wastedbrains | Hacker News Reader

I am just not really surprised. Their tech is just not the best in any category.

I hosted on windows server, now Linux I had my PC on windows, now I run OSX and Linux. I had a pocketpc phone which killed the palm and then completely stopped innovating and was in some cases still very buggy, now I have an iPhone. I used Office, then switched to open office and now 80% google docs. I have never liked MS browsers, Firefox all the way. I can't think of a single web property from MS I use...

With them loosing all the developers, developers, developers... It doesn't take long until they start to loose people that are leading everyone elses technology choices.

(I admit visual studio is pretty sweet, but I use Ruby)

View on HN

I was just about to say that. About the only MS product I actually like (as opposed to use out of necessity) is Visual Studio. It's the only one that keeps innovating and has a feature set ahead of much of the competition.

Well, I gues add Xbox to the list. MS came into the market and beat Sony on features fair and square, and built up a whole new meaning for online multiplayer. Good for them. If only their Windows and Office teams were half as innovative.

Xbox Live is the only truly innovative product I can think of that MS has put out in quite a long time. And even Xbox Live is getting pretty old.

I think I read somewhere that these days the 360 is more profitable than their OS or any of their software. I liked Live, but never really thought it was worth it since a majority of the games that included a multiplayer feature either hit or miss, while most missed. i.e. Halo (anyone of them) all hit. Star Wars BattleFront (anyone of them), all missed.

It's really the social aspect of Live that is the most innovative. While most people were still playing with server lists and friends lists, MS had a way for you to log in and instantly jump into a game that your friend is playing. You could even tell what they were doing inside each game (e.g. "Tom is on rescuing the princess in Some Game.")

And the fact that they completely overhauled their interface, added new features (like Netflix streaming), all while being still ahead of the pack, is extremely un-Microsoft-like. Usually I expect to see MS innovate only when they've been soundly beaten by the competition. It's a breath of fresh air.

Very true, although I don't own a 360 I have plenty of friends that do, and one feature I thought was interesting was how easy it was for my friend (who is as ignorant about computers and networking as anyone else in the masses) to manage his home network and files (which was on windows inevitably) through his 360, which he never knew how or cared about before owning a 360. Another thing that caught my attention was the content Microsoft made readily available to 360 users, (as you pointed out, steaming Netflix) from entire games, free demos, other user profiles, and game stats.

The only thing that comes close to giving MS a run for its money is, surprisingly, Steam. I've been playing some Left 4 Dead lately, and the social features in that game are very compelling, and it stretches over to other Valve games like Team Fortress 2, and even some third-party titles.

Too bad PC gaming is a bit of a dying industry :(

> Too bad PC gaming is a bit of a dying industry :(

This is a good thing for a number of reasons. One is that there's no need to have Windows around anymore, meaning that home users can switch to something more usable, stable, and secure. The other is that game companies will only have to test two configurations (Sony and Microsoft), instead of the thousands that they do on PC games. Less QA grunt work == more features, or faster releases.

I'll concede that FPSes suck on consoles, but considering they all have USB, there's no reason why you can't connect a keyboard and mouse to them.

I think Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress 2 have been great examples of why console multiplayer is still substandard. Both games came out, sold massive numbers of copies, and naturally some balance problems were discovered.

Valve patched the PC versions almost immediately, and in fact have even added content to the game in subsequent updates. All of these updates just hit the 360 version days ago. MS is allergic to fast-turnaround updates, and also allergic to free content updates (it sets a bad precedent for devs who want to charge for more content).

I think the zune is a truly innovative product. It seems that everyone always immediately writes it off as an iPod ripoff, but the zune experience is actually really unique.

I use XBox Live, but I don't find it innovative at all. I pay Microsoft to play on the internet, which I can do free on other systems. I'm not a pro gamer, I don't care about achievements or rankings. Downloading demos is nice, but not innovative.

OK, but on the other hand, when has their tech ever been the best in some category? I can think of some interesting things they've done in MSR and even a couple of decent products they've made, but on the whole Microsoft's success in business does not seem to have been related to their technical achievements.

Interesting point, but for a long time I think linux on the desktop really just couldn't cut it for a decent experience. Apple before OSX was untouchable as far as development experience... So there was a long period that I would say Windows was the best tech in the OS market, by quite a bit.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com