This article is not very enlightening. It: doesn't address any of the claims; views the jury decision as if it were the final adjudication rather than something that will be appealed and likely modified; quotes Apple rumor website commenters.
The way I am reading this article, and it can be wrong, is as a by-and-large synthesis on the author's point of view on why US patent law is antiquated and supposevily bad for the Tech Industry of this country.
I don't see any of his points as incorrect, in fact I agree with his sentiment.
Therefore, do you disagree with he is saying? Or do you just think that he is right, but fails to make any good suggestion on how to change the current flawed system?