Hacker News Reader

after how many years in power one can assume that the prosecution is simply ineffective in uncovering something resembling the truth when it's directly about those in power?

View on HN

Why investigate if we can simply assume the accused is guilty.

Why assume innocence when the accused has de-facto executive control over the prosecution?

This is simply not the case.

Edited: removed some inflammatory language I shouldn't have used.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com