Considering it's a healthcare app, that PoV seems pretty daft and somewhat discriminatory. Catering to disabled people also isn't mega profitable, but we do it anyway.

An alternative PoV from me could be that going cross-platform means you can use the "rich users" iOS sales to subsidize the "poverty users" Android sales, same how our society does it with healthcare.

In billions, Q2 2024 Consumer App Spending v (total 2024 est. devices)

   $24.6 Apple/iOs (1.74)
   $11.2 Google/Android (4.2)

I see you are getting downvoted, but it's still true. An Android app brings in a fraction of the revenue. In case someone wants numbers: Look for the total revenue of Apple's App Store compared to the Play Store and then look for the total number of devices for each. It's a huge difference.

Of course a business will cater to the lucrative platform first or even exclusively.

And now, go ahead, downvote me as much as you want. Won't change the calculus though.