That's because nobody learns how to do statistics and/or those who do are not really interested in it.
I taught statistics to biology students. Most them treated the statistics (and programming) courses like chores. Out of 300-ish students per year we had one or two that didn't leave uni mostly clueless about statistics.
For me, stats was something I had to re-learn years after graduating, after I realized their importance (not just practical, but also epistemological). During university years, whatever interest I might have had, got extinguished the second the TA started talking about those f-in urns filled with colored balls.
The point stands though.
It's really the same problem as with math in school in general ("whatever is this even useful for?") - most people don't like doing abstract, self-contained puzzles with no apparent utility, but being high-stakes (you're being graded on it).
That argument is a strawman whenever it comes up because it applies to every subject. High jump? Napoleon wars? Molar weight of helium? English literature in the 19th century? What is any of that ever "useful" for? To understand the world which you live in. What a lack of education leads to is blatently obvious with the current U.S. administration. It's not about each school lesson directly translating into monetary value in a later job, neither w.r.t colored balls nor with knowing how the american civil war started.
In the US, students are the paying customers. The consequence for not learning everything is lowered skills available for the job market (engineering) or life (philosophy?).
To me it is preferable that students who do not understand are not rated highly by the university (=do not get top marks), but “forcing” the students to learn statistics? That doesn’t make much sense.
Also, there’s nothing wrong with learning something after uni. Every skill I use in my job was developed post-degree. Really.
Only on paper. In many cases - I'd risk betting in vast majority of cases - the actual paying customers are parents.
> The consequence for not learning everything is lowered skills available for the job market (engineering) or life (philosophy?).
The ability to perceive and comprehend this kind of consequences is something that develops early in adulthood; some people get it in school, but others (again, I'd bet majority) only half-way through university or even later.
On paper, you have students who're paying for education. In reality, their parents are paying an expected fee for an expected stage of life of their kids.
> those f-in urns filled with colored balls.
I did my Abitur [1] in 2005, back then that used to be high school material.
When I was teaching statistics we had to cut more and more content from the courses in favor of getting people up to speed on content that they should have known from school.
Also, calling them "urns". There are exactly two common usages of the word "urn" in Polish - the box you put your votes into during elections, and the vase for storing ashes of cremated people.