Inside Larry Ellison’s Insane Plan to Turn America’s Cup Into a TV Spectacle
wired.com
wired.com
We went down to the wharf to see it the day it was launched.
Staggering size...
It's a catamaran with a 13m (42.7 ft.) tall solid wing and is expected to be able to hit 50 knots (90+ km/h).
They have to anchor it to a tonne and a half of ballast just to keep it from taking off on it's own.
The AC45 (the boat being used in current cup events while the larger AC72's are being designed and built) uses a 21.5m (71ft) wing ... and the boats that will be used in the actual Cup (the AC72) are even larger beasts -- a wing 40m (131ft) tall [1].
The design of and technology going into these AC class boats is fascinating. It's been a lot of fun watching the AC45's race and the AC72's will be quite a sight out on the water once they begin pushing 'em to their limits.
[1] http://www.cupinfo.com/en/americas-cup-2013-boats-ac72-ac45....
It was definitely the AC72 that we went to see.. it was launched in July and completely towered over all the over yachts and surrounding buildings.
The numbers, I guess, are from the AC45 that was launched months ago. Looks like the numbers weren't accurate, but that's the NZ Herald for you.
You can diminish that by placing more buoys to round (effectively making the course smaller), but I am not sure it still is sailing, then.
Not for the first time I heard spectators of the Olympics say that sailing is a very confusing sport and I hope that what is being done in the America's Cup and continued in London 2012 will help. On the other hand, I as a sailor, would like to see certain aspects of the race which are not spectator friendly at all.
Don't let that stop you from writing 5000 words about it. This reeks of "pick someone to hate, find a reason to hate them, write it up".
In this case, the hero and focus of the article is not Ellison, but Stan Honey, the guy behind the new software system, and Ellison is just the force of nature that set the stage.
A lot of Wired features are written that way and there's very rarely any venom in it.
In this case even Ellison is painted relatively sympathetically, as the eccentric billionaire trying to do something slightly crazy but that might yet have a chance of success against really tough odds. It describes some problems he's run into, but it also cites people who see what he's done as positive.
Part of the problem with hockey on TV is that flying pucks
move so quickly they are almost invisible to the at-home
viewer. Honey proposed digitally inserting a blue glow
around the puck that would lengthen into a contrail whenever
it was moving faster than the eye could see.
Funny, the first place I ever read about this was in Wired in the mid-90s. I think they called it "pucktrax." There's virtually no mention of it online anymore, except for a handful of snarky forum posts deriding Fox's use of a "gaudy blue flame."see: http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/archive/t-606021-p-37.html, among other places.
I don't know why WIRED is increasingly becoming such a snotty, hostile and tabloid publication. I guess it's cool to hate on Ellison for putting money into a wonderful sport.
While we can't afford these huge multi-million dollar boats, we can have much of the same excitement in our own lives racing $20,000-$30,000 boats. And you don't even need a boat-- since crews tend to be 5-7 people owners are often looking for crew!
Good coverage of the Americas Cup will hopefully help bring more people into the sport of racing.
There're a lot of better reasons to get your hate on towards Larry Ellison, in my mind.
Sounds like bad software design. Should have written one generic program that can paint lines and expose an interface to it