The contempt, the general lack of curiosity and the violence of the bold sweeping statements people will make here are mind-boggling.
The contempt, the general lack of curiosity and the violence of the bold sweeping statements people will make here are mind-boggling.
Honestly, I find the Hacker News comments in recent years to be most enlightening because so many comments come from people who spent years immersed in rationalist communities.
For years one of my friend groups was deep into LessWrong and SSC. I've read countless blog posts and other content out of those groups.
Yet every time I write about it, I'm dismissed as an uninformed outsider. It's an interesting group of people who like to criticize and dissect other groups, but they don't take kindly to anyone questioning their own circles.
No; you're being dismissed as someone who is entirely too credulous about arguments that don't hold up to scrutiny.
Edit: and as someone who doesn't understand basics about what rationalists are trying to accomplish in certain contexts (like the concept of a calibration curve re the example you brought up of https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/grading-my-2021-predictions). You come across (charitably) as having missed the point, because you have.
If you open any thread related to Zig or Odin or C++ you can usually ctrl-F "Rust" and find someone having an argument about how Rust is better.
EDIT: Didn't have to look very far back for an example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44319008
The rationalists have not had any such clearly positive effects, and rather their adherents (Thiel, Vance, etc) have had severely deleterious effects on society.
There is no comparison between the two communities.
Mentioning Thiel and Vance together brings to mind a different thread of weird netizen philosophizing - one I don't really know much about but which I guess I'd sum up as the "Moldbug / Curtis Yarvin fandom." "Neoreactionaries" might be the right term?
I definitely recognize that the Venn diagram between those two "intellectual movements" (big scare quotes there) overlaps quite a bit, but it seems like a bit of stretch to lump what Vance, Thiel, and other right-wing tech bro types are up to under the rationalism banner.
Update: Having read through some of the other links in the thread, I have "updated" (as the rationalists say) my mental model of that Venn diagram to be slightly more overlapping. I still think they're distinct, but there's more cross-pollination between the Moldbugs and the ACX crowd than I initially realized.
I will say as someone who has been programming before we had standardized C++ that “programming communities” aren’t my cup of tea. I like the passion and enthusiasm but it would be good for some of those lads to have a drag, see a shrink and get some nookie.