US FDA approves Gilead's twice-yearly injection for HIV prevention
reuters.com
reuters.com
https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/fact-sheets/pre-ex...
if you are HIV negative, have had anal or vaginal sex in the past 6 months, and:
Have a sexual partner with HIV (especially if the partner has an unknown or detectable viral load), or
Have not consistently used a condom, or
Have been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the past 6 months.
This is a very, very high number of candidate patients! Anyone who inconsistently uses a condom. "During 2011–2015, 14.8 percent of women and 19 percent of men aged 15–44 reported that they used a condom ‘every time’ they had intercourse in the past 12 months,” the NCHS team wrote in their report." [1][1] https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/third-u-s-men-use...
This should, in theory, cause the infection rate to rapidly decline when you disrupt the most common and frequent transmission vectors. The slow long burn is going to be upkeep on all of this until HIV is eradicated (similar to the last days of a disease due to sufficient vaccination uptake, think smallpox).
This thing is cool but it would be even better if it didn’t cost a fortune.
Is there any prevention with this vaccine ? Or you will make an "lighter type" of disease as with other viruses ?
Now the real question is insurance. Is this cheaper than the pills?
To my knowledge even the previous injections were hard to get insurance to pay for given how cheap you can get truvada since its generic.