0% chance European investigators find renewables at fault.
There are known problems with renewables, but there's also solutions that can be retrofit onto renewables to avoid those problems. Renewable power suppliers won't like those costs because it will cost money.
Hopefully the EU does a decent investigation though.
https://www.eldiario.es/economia/sanchez-manda-mensaje-claro...
Outright lie specially considering we got power back in huge part thanks to France nuclear power.
Ok, so why bring up French nuclear power then?
> after the blackout started to say basically nothing
Yeah, I mean typical governments, "basically nothing" is their forte.
I've also been listening to what they're saying (or not) since the blackout happened too, and the only concrete thing they're saying is "wait for the full report", I'm not sure how anyone could understand it any differently.
I bet the reason of the blackout was exactly our lack of combined cycle or nuclear those days, we were running mostly on solar.
I'm glad you realize what they're saying finally.
> the same day of the blackout while power was still gone he practically said nuclear was useless or even a problem
I don't remember him saying that at all, and we were glued to the radio the entire day basically. And you seem to still mix up the fact that Sanchez has been saying that "Spanish nuclear plants" are a problem, which is true, they're not being well taken care of, and he is not the only one saying that.
He is not saying "nuclear power" as a concept sucks or is a problem, or that the French nuclear plants made things worse, only that our nuclear plants kind of suck, which is true.
As is typical, you seem to miss completely any sort of nuance when you think and talk about these issues, especially considering the context. You say you understand it, you provide some article to "back it up", but everything points towards you misunderstanding most of the content you seem to consume.
1) ... because renewables are clearly not at fault and can be discounted immediately?
2) ... because they're ideologically protecting faulty renewables?
1 is a stretch (I don't think they likely are at fault - the disinformation on this is obvious, but investigators have to investigate everything), and 2 is bilge.