Helen Keller famously said that before she had language (the first word of which was “water”) she had nothing, a void, and the minute she had language, “the whole world came rushing in.”
Perhaps we are not so very different?
Perhaps we are not so very different?
Yet they cannot take action themselves.
Neither could Hawking, once the motor neurone disease got far enough.
Additionally, thinking organisms don’t get stuck in never ending loops because they can CHOOSE to exit the loop. LLMs don’t have that ability
E.g. it could have access to camera and microphone feed, which is automatically given to it in interval as part of the loop, it could call tools or functions to store specific bits and pieces of information, to store in its RAG or whatever based knowledge base. It is not going to be in the loop of producing the same token over and over, it would be new tokens because the context and environment is constantly evolving.
It does nothing. Because there is not impetus for it to do anything by itself.
4o
Maintain context and trigger at 1 second intervals.
It has no desires of its own. Nothing that motivates it. It’s not conscious.
We get constantly changing input. And yet, look at this thread, where the same points are being echoed without anyone changing their mind.