But it gets a lot of hate in PL circles for reasons I don't completely understand.
But it gets a lot of hate in PL circles for reasons I don't completely understand.
My tl;dr:
The vlang team has repeatedly made false promises and assertions about what the language can do, ranging from a "we put things that are on our roadmap in our features list" to "we've promised something that is outright impossible". Analyzing how this has changed over the years, the only reasonable conclusion is that they're grifters who are okay with lying.
In addition, they regularly engage in flamewars about it on this site, and their moderation practices of silencing any sort of criticism in their own spaces and calling anyone who dares question it idiots are well known and documented.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27441848
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39503446
I'm not even for or against vlang-- I just find their behavior and imagination rather bizarre.
Additionally, vlang has other backends (ability to compile to other languages), such as JavaScript, WASM, native (in development), etc... There were contributors proposing having Pascal (Free Pascal variant) and Go as backend options too. There have already been discussions and experiments around creating V2Go libraries. Various developers appear to be waiting for the language to become a bit mature.
As common sense will tell us, the only people likely to be upset about the language's consistent progress, are those who feel its a personal threat, have an axe to grind, or swallowed misinformation. Regular folks would not be worried or care, except about what they are using or working on. At the end of the day, it's a programming language, that we can choose to use or move on in life. It's really not or need not be anything more complicated than that.
[1] https://www.slant.co/topics/15491/~general-purpose-programmi... (vlang on top)
[2] https://www.youtube.com/live/puy77WfM1Tg/ (Anthony GG Review)
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_voaf4Qw4w/ (Antono2 Review)