I think that was a joke. New pricing is already in place:
Input: $2.00 / 1M tokens
Cached input: $0.50 / 1M tokens
Output: $8.00 / 1M tokens
https://openai.com/api/pricing/
Now cheaper than gpt-4o and same price as gpt-4.1 (!).
Input: $2.00 / 1M tokens
Cached input: $0.50 / 1M tokens
Output: $8.00 / 1M tokens
https://openai.com/api/pricing/
Now cheaper than gpt-4o and same price as gpt-4.1 (!).
This is where the naming choices get confusing. "Should" o3 cost more or less than GPT-4.1? Which is more capable? A generation 3 of tech intuitively feels less advanced than a 4.1 of a (similar) tech.
- o4 is reasoning
- 4o is not
They simply do not do a good job of differentiating. Unless you work directly in the field, it is likely not obvious what is the difference between "our most powerful reasoning model" and "our flagship model for complex tasks."
"Does my complex task need reasoning or not?" seems to be how one would choose. (What type of task is complex but does not require any reasoning?) This seems less than ideal!
The speculation of only input pricing being lowered was because yesterday they gave out vouchers for 1M free input tokens while output tokens were still billed.