Hacker News Reader

Not sure that such a heavily edited two-minute clip is fully representative of the over hour and a half-long meeting (which also includes a presentation detailing the years worth of science done in the leadup to that meeting)[0]

[0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAWGpASZexI

I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here. That's a video of them voting for if a recommendation is adopted or not. The science was all done before the recommendation was put together.

Because they take a vote? I am not sure what you are hinting at here. I see some people who take a unanimous vote. They seem to be in agreement about an issue, maybe it was uncontroversial and they wanted to move on? What should we see here instead in your opinion?

Why not?