i did a round of feedback with some fellow founders and they were way, way more difficult than the VCs were.
Just checked out your profile, you probably had access to other experienced founders who'd been through similar fundraising experiences. Were they more difficult because of that direct experience, or just naturally more critical in their review style?
I'm thinking most early founders don't have that kind of network though, maybe that's why they're getting much softer feedback.
Did you find the VC questions predictable after getting grilled by fellow founders, or were there still surprises?