Yes, that's what the article is about.
And yes, the comment is confidently wrong as said in that page.
And yes, the comment is confidently wrong as said in that page.
Not really. Hand-waving over hypothetical unit costs means nothing. In fact, I wonder if that's why the article lists no specifics on the cost structure of the spot instance based approach, and why the cloud 101 approach is spun to be such a surprise.
> And yes, the comment is confidently wrong as said in that page.
You're literally trying to gaslight when all it takes to verify your claim is a single click. Wild.
And the article has the standard machine spec, and the page shows clearly your information is blatantly wrong.
Fitting a different content into your own pre-set wrong mental model is not worth engaging over.