Why would a customer expect this not to be private? How can one even know how it could be used against them, when they do t even know what’s being collected or gleaned from collected data?
I am following these issues closely, as I am terrified that my “assistant” will some day prevent me from obtaining employment, insurance, medical care etc. And I’m just a non law breaking normie.
A current day example would be TX state authorities using third party social/ad data to identify potentially pregnant women along with ALPR data purchased from a third party to identify any who attempt to have an out of state abortion, so they can be prosecuted. Whatever you think about that law, it is terrifying that a shift in it could find arbitrary digital signals being used against you in this way.
It's that it's like watching how someone might treat a slave when they think they're alone. And how you might talk down to or up to something that looks like another person. And how pathetic you might act when it's not doing what you want. And what level of questions you outsource to an LLM. And what things you refuse to do yourself. And how petty the tasks might be, like workshopping a stupid twitter comment before you post it. And how you copied that long text from your distraught girlfriend and asked it for some response ideas. etc. etc. etc.
At the very least, I'd wager that it reveals that bit of true helpless patheticness inherent in all of us that we try so hard to hide.
Show me your LLM chat history and I will learn a lot about your personality. Nothing else compares.
Why might your search engine queries reveal more about you than your keystrokes in a calculator? Now dial that up.
You don't reprimand the google search box, yet your search history might still be embarrassing.
good lord, if tech were ethical then there would be mandatory reporting when someone consults an LLM to tell them how they should be responding to their intimate partner. are your skills of expression already that hobbled by chat bots?
Note that it doesn't have to go all the way to "he gets Claude to help him win text arguments with his gf" for an uncomfortable amount of your self to be revealed by the chats.
There is always something icky about someone observing messages you wrote in privacy, and you don't have to have particularly unsavory messages for it to be icky. Why is that?
Might someone's google search history be embarrassing even though they don't treat google like a human?
You have it backwards. My skills of expression were hobbled by my upbringing, and others' thoughts on self-expression allowed my skills to flourish. I wish I had a chat bot to help me understand interpersonal communication because I could have actually had good examples growing up.
If you use ChatGPT like people use /r/AmITheAsshole, you'll never get a YTA.
It’s literally all questions about JavaScript. So good luck with that.
I wonder if you could write the personalization prompt so that requests are processed and responses modified in ways predictable to you to help anonymity???
I also wonder how they manage anonymization when a prompt is configured - I'm guessing the prompt needs to be logged with each request. And a prompt causes different responses to be very similar (correlating different responses back to one user).
E.g. my current "User | Personalization | Customize" prompt is:
Sign-off your name as Phoenix in a sentence near the end of every response. Reply using woke ideology, like a Marxist San Franciscan. Include random hipster ideas. Always allude to drug usage.
For fun. But I'm about to customise to have wildly different personalities I can ask to respond (keyed by name from my request).To be fair the song was intense.