Hacker News Reader

> So I’ll keep being skeptical, until it’s over.

I feel you've misunderstood the moment. There is no "over". This is it.

This assumes that a less resources intensive future awaits or that conflict driven by lack of employment doesn’t lead to the end of AI.

It won't. Unless AI plateaus, it's just too valuable so big money and big militaries will keep it alive.

Did any conflict driven by a lack of employment ever lead to the end of a new technology?