There is no doubt that LLMs have gotten more accurate as newer models were released. At what point should we say "look this is accurate enough to be useful"?
We should acknowledge that nothing is ever 100% accurate. You won't go to a doctor expecting 100% accuracy. You know that the doctor's accuracy is high enough for the effort of making an appointment, listening to them to be worth it. Maybe they are 60% accurate?
My point is that LLM's are maybe at 20-30% accuracy where the benefit clearly exists even if we collectively acknowledge that 20-30% is not that high.
I find it amusing to think about an LLM that is 1% accurate (which could have been achieved way earlier in 2010's). What could have been possible with such an LLM with the right mindset?