I would've rather been sent to the ugly site if it doesn't have marketing cookies and a membership popup.
I would've rather been sent to the ugly site if it doesn't have marketing cookies and a membership popup.
My first instinct was the same as yours so hf visiting https://taylor.town/
Edit: after posting this the taylor.town site became much slower - so maybe that's the hn hug of death gripping again
> Taylor Troesh is mayor of taylor.town, author of scrapscript, and connoisseur of crap.
And on taylor.town is a link to the magazine article which they contributed.
Each of the blog screenshots has a caption like this:
> taylor.town in 202x
I guess that's just a landing page with links to articles he wrote, but doesn't host himself? Strange.
And it really is ugly right now with the spotted background and slightly rotated links.
Is he aiming for the "I just discovered a new feature and so need to use it" vibe? Like when someone makes a PowerPoint presentation and now uses the completely over the top transitions across slides?
But design is subjective, and if you're doing something in your free time, you better enjoy it! So if he has fun making that ugly thing, great ( • ‿ • )
I think this website is bad, but I also think it is very funny to have:
(1) a banner about print editions (2) a cookie consent u (3) a header 'Good Internet' peeking through the now-familiar modern hallmarks of the bad internet, and (4) the first four words of the headline, which is being eclipsed by the cookie popup (5) Once you remove the cookie banner, there is now also a persistent cookie settings button, and a persistent "+ Become a Member" button.
taylor.town is a very good internet website by comparison
https://taylor.town/wealth-000
I made my website myself too and it isn't ugly. This guy's website is ugly because he decided to make it ugly out of some misguided sense of self-importance.
But how is it misguided? OP is having fun on their personal site. Where would you guide them instead?