Hacker News Reader

I'm glad this study has been done. I haven't read the article in its entirety, but seems like a powerful argument for separating religion from state if a stable democracy is the goal.

View on HN

Religion is largely a belief in a way of living life. Democracy happens to be the most powerful religion at the moment, heretics can be imprisoned for life such as William Pickard was for manufacturing LSD and sinning against the belief of the congregation. People who disavow themselves entirely of the religion of democracy are laughed at ('sovereign citizens') while those priests who pretend to practice it while violating the tenants ('cops') are revered.

'Democracy' (in practice a republic in places like US) is just a different religion. Without the devoutism of a segment of powerful 'believers', the religion in power switches to a different one.

There would be an unfathomable amount to pick apart on this, but among the many thoughts in here,

> those priests who pretend to practice it while violating the tenants ('cops') are revered.

vs.

mentions of US and US events is the most strikingly conflicting one.

But this is exactly what happens in a democracy: majority rule. You can't separate religion from state in this sense.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com