the manifesto [1] is the most interesting thing. I agree that DuckDB has the largest potential to disrupt the current order with Iceberg.
However, this mostly reads to me as thought experiment: > what if the backend service of an Iceberg catalog was just a SQL database?
The manifesto says that maintaining a data lake catalog is easier, which I agree with in theory. s3-files-as-information-schema presents real challenges!
But, what I most want to know is what's the end-user benefit?
What does someone get with this if they're already using Apache Polaris or Lakekeeper as their Iceberg REST catalog?