features sound great though, i would actually check it out if i were doing sales.
You're spot on about "Cursor for X" potentially confusing people. Our thinking was to evoke an AI deeply embedded in your sales workflow, helping get stuff done, kinda like how Cursor (the IDE) assists developers. Definitely --not-- aiming for an IDE vibe, more the "AI-native assistant" part. "Copilot for Sales" certainly has that instant clarity.
We're still figuring out the best way to phrase this, this kind of feedback is super helpful.
Glad the actual features sound promising though! If you (or anyone reading) ever do give it a spin, we'd love to hear more thoughts, especially if a better way to describe it comes to mind. Naming things in engineering is actually one the hardest issues ahah!
I've uncursored and copiloted the title above now. Thanks!
its just we are currently confronted by a deluge of startups of "cursor for x" bc of obvious reasons and its an open question whether to lean into it or stand out by not
In this case: AI to improve your sales calls
or
AI assistant for better human sales calls