I thought it was a different kind of nonsense, but it still has a subtle error. Goes to show even more how risky it is to repeat LLM answers as factual.
It is really hard to follow you if you don't explain yourself.
I'm not saying it's factual. The reason I showed that answer was simply to verify to see if it was what you thought it was (hence I asked "is it?"). It turns out that it wasn't fully.