You can get similar results by downloading a boilerplate template project for that though.
LLM makes that a bit easier and faster to do, but is also a bit more error prone than a template project.
LLM makes that a bit easier and faster to do, but is also a bit more error prone than a template project.
1. You have to remember all the technologies you need included, my company template already has them.
2. LLM doesn’t have a standardized directory structure, so you end up with different projects having different structures and file naming conventions. This makes later refactoring or upgrades across multiple projects less automatable (sometimes this can be solved by having an LLM do those, but they often are unsuccessful in some projects still)
3. LLMs have a knowledge cutoff. If your company has already moved to a version after that knowledge cutoff, you need to upgrade the LLM generated code.
I very much prefer having a company template to asking an LLM to generate the initial project.