A Statistical Portrait of a Y Combinator Batch
blog.statwing.com
blog.statwing.com
Great work Statwing. Can't wait until I have some data that needs analyzing so I can use your service.
I had a suspicion that that might be true, but I wonder why that is? Perhaps older founders tackle problems that need more domain expertise and more people? Or perhaps they can rely on savings and have been able to bootstrap a little better than high-school/college grads?
Anyway, good job on StatWing, I love playing around with numbers and graphs. Perhaps some public datasets will help people get more familiar with the app and serve as demo.
I predict that marital / family status would have more to do with it than just raw age (allowing that age may somewhat correlate with being married / having children). That is, a single founder who is 39 is, as far as I can tell, not much different than a 25 year old founder. Being in that position myself, I can at least tell you that the "now or never" effect mentioned below is very motivational for us old farts. I know I work harder on Fogbeam Labs now than I would have when I was 25, and I'd be comfortable saying I work approximately as hard as most 19, 23, 27, 32 or whatever year old founders.
Now, if I were married with children at home, I probably would not be willing to put in those hours... in that regard, I kinda agree with your hypotheses.
Let's not rush to find an explanation, now!
Looking at the data, we see that two outliers (age 30 with 10 employees, age 33 with 12 employees) are driving what is admittedly a "small" correlation. These two companies are about 4 standard deviations away from the mean of 1.4 employees/company.
They're arguably outliers, and I suspect they're skewing any effect we might be seeing.
Of course, a small, skewed sample (tech companies in YC) obviously means we can't infer a damn thing beyond YC members to begin with, but its worth pointing out those outliers.
Granted, it's just one anecdote, but that definitely rings true here.
Many of the benefits of an incubator (or even of angel investing/VC/etc in general) are the benefits of experience. No need to spend time gaining something you've already got and certainly no need to give up equity for it.
Not sure if that was meant for me, or just for everyone else reading this thread, but I definitely don't think that way. When I say "it's now or never," I mean "it's now or never to launch this startup, and make it work by hook or by crook." YC isn't even on our radar now, for various reasons, but we're confident we'll succeed with or without any given incubator, or anybody else, aside from the only people who matter - customers.
It's 1:3.
I am basing this on my memory that 1990 was the peak year for those born in Gen Y. (I cannot find the data set to back it up, but I bet someone else knows where to get it).
+ a few outside of Gen Y.
The results mostly confirm industry suspicions that enforcement differs the most based on what region an operator is in (poor regulatory performance operators are mostly located in the same regulatory region).
What was neat was how little individual manufacturer's designs mattered. But over time, it was either hugely advantageous or hugely disadvantageous to simultaneously operate multiple types of designs. Example: in 2007 it was about 5% better to simultaneously operate multiple designs, but in 2010, it was about 17% worse.
Also confirmed that it was much, much better (from a penalty standpoint) to find and self-disclose regulatory non-compliance rather than to let the regulator find it.
Awesome work guys! Will there be an ability to play with the time dimension soon?
Time is tricky. That's among our most requested features, though. So we won't get to it in the very very near future, but its definitely on the roadmap.
Thanks for the comments, really appreciate it!
Anyone privy to this information and willing to share?
An interesting model for sure and one that will ultimately make for technical sense but enterprise woes in the future. I'm not sure if businesses will want to upload the data that would most benefit from the StatWing treatment. It looks like they have realized that though. Maybe aiming to cut their teeth on people who generate a lot of data and then take a stab at going enterprise via partnerships with other companies that already have a strong presence in big companies but are lacking in the analytics.
So, really, past experience with this sort of thing and seeing that they were using d3.
Not sure that I can speak to the prevalence of social startups in this age range, apart from the obvious "kids these days" take on it. Bear in mind, though, that it's not purely a representation of what 26- and 27-year-old founders are doing -- it's also reflective of YC's position.
We were exactly the cohort who got facebook off the ground - I joined in March of '04, spring of my freshman year - so while we may not be "social web natives" depending on your interpretation of such a noxious term, we're definitely well-acquainted with it. Probably well enough acquainted to feel that we know what features are missing, what niches are underserved, or something along those lines, with existing social services.
I can't wait to see what this team does next!
I love what Statwing is doing here, but they could be providing people with enough information to be "dangerous."
The employee count vs. founder age analysis in another thread is a perfect example. Posters are trying to explain why employee counts rise with founder ages, when a glance at the plot suggests the effect results from two companies with abnormally-high (~4 standard deviations from the mean) employee counts.
Statwing is definitely pretty and fast! I'm curious, however, to see how they'll work to help people with diverse backgrounds interpret results.
For example, data on one company:
# of Founders: 1 Founder Age: 43 Number of Months Worked: 20 Number of Employees / Contractors (FTE): 2 Social? No Mobile? No