Most dependency injection that I see in the wild completely misses this distinction. Inversion can promote good engineering practices, injection can be used to help with the inversion, but you don’t need to use it.
Liskov substitution for example is an overkill way of saying don't create an implementation that throws an UnsupportedOperationException, instead break the interfaces up (Interface Segregation "I" in SOLID) and use the interface you need.
Quoting the theory to junior devs instead just makes their eyes roll :D
ISP isn’t about avoiding UnsupportedOperationException as well, it’s about reducing dependencies.