... And angels (how many) can dance on the head of a pin.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on...

(Something theologians debate about endlessly and absolutely uselessly. That is all they are good, er, bad, for.)

Yeah, right. Pontificating much? Pathetic.

How do you know he/she is "weak"? No argument provided. And the same for "incorrect".

And who the hell are you to judge them?

Let me apply some of your own judgement "ointment" on you:

>essentially always incorrect.

Your use of the word essentially in that phrase is essentially inessential. :) The meaning is equally well conveyed without that word. IOW, it's fluff, and can be done away with, fluffy kid. (wags wings at you. hi!)

Grok what I mean?

Grr.

;)