Funny how, when a policy that was considered completely crazy a few years ago is introduced, there will be an army of people trying to find every justification for that policy to become normalized.
An interesting concept to alleviate this problem has been pioneered in Melbourne local politics is citizen councils.
No one has infinite time or attention.
The conclusion is: "We'll see".
One might argue that the sight in question tends toward the Trumpian side of things in general, I suppose.
Every flavour of economics enjoys some level of widespread support, there are still a bunch of people who profess a commitment to Marxism. Nobody listens to them (hurrah!) but they're still there. If we had Marxists in charge their articles would probably get a lot more traction though because people want to know what is going to happen next. Ditto things like the gold standard, fiat currency, ultra-low taxes, ultra-high taxes, globalism and economic independence strategies.
TLDR; there is probably a strong selection bias here.