Hacker News Reader

I am kind of confused why can't you just create a new MCP tool that encapsulates parsing and other required steps together in a code block?

This would be more reliable than expecting the LLM to generate working code 100% of the time?

View on HN

You should for sure do this for common post processing tasks. However, you're usually not going to know all the types of post-processing users will want to do with tool call output at design-time.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com