Why do we need startups?
Why do we need so much that the thought of wrapping the mentality of a whole society around it comes to mind before questioning its legitimacy in a certain context? So serial startup-making can be executed like chain smoking. What are the big benefits that this very form and specific brand of organization type deserves special treatment, other formations or no formations, single persons, departments in a keep-going company, co-ops, semi-chaotic group of enthusiast, or whatever will never ever produce without absorbing proper startup mentality to the core of the society?
I am sceptic, yes, not least because I was in a startup of a serial startuper where half of the efforts were spent on being a proper startup. How startupers do, how they act, what they do in what stage, what is the proper procedure for being a startup? There is even television series that was used as reference. Remaining efforts went into other detals, one among those was product development. Asking another startup founder about where he sees the company in 5 years the answer was 'Sold!' without a second of hesitation. I was phrasing wrong, I assumed I was asking about the product roadmap that happened to be made in the formal setting of this organization, but that was not in the focus of the minds apparently.
Americans can have an inflated positivistic style pulled on when they want to anyways, to be enthusiastic for the sake of enthusiasm, in selective situations, easily shifted to and away from anything. I wouldn't rely on that too much, but especially wouldn't use as reference for transforming a different society that may be a bit more repelling with the same thing of all things.
These are different skill sets, and developing competency in both generally takes a long time focusing on each. That takes a lot of time and willingness.
For example, I co-own a business with two other people. When we started out, we did have the benefit of at least one of us having some amount of education and experience in business areas like corporate structure and financial accounting.
We still contemplated a structure (specifically an S-Corp) which would have created headaches down the road. It was tempting at the time because it would have been simpler at the time, but we spent weeks going back and forth. We went with a C-Corp and it turned out that future-us was really glad we took the time.
It’s definitely true that you should focus on what you’re good at, but when you start a business you’re going to have to focus on new things that you may have never had to think about before. If you wish to do well you need to care about those things too.
Europe: "You are my friend, so your success makes me look like a failure, and your failure makes me look like a success"
Tangentially, it’s why I don’t think authoritarian reactionary stuff will “take” here for any length of time. The instant Americans figure out it’s anything more than a stylistic performative way to “own” the other side — the instant they are actually told what to do — it is over.
As a European that has spent a significant amount of time over the last 5 years in America this has been a cultural learning for me.
He is not and has never been broadly popular beyond his cult of personality. He's just been pitted against an opposition party that is a moribund gerontocracy utterly unwilling or unable to field likable candidates, and the US electoral system is structurally a two-party oligopoly that makes it impossible for anyone else to disrupt this situation.
That's how it looks to me, but it's not necessarily reflected in the statistics:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/social-mo...
Canada is, for example, supposedly more mobile than the US, yet when I look at Canada I see a country with absolutely insane real estate prices (relative to median income) in most major cities (worse than most of the US outside SF and maybe NYC) and much lower salaries for professional jobs like engineering. I really wonder how that comes up as having better mobility. It might be harder to end up in the gutter in Canada, but it also seems like it's much harder to rise above working to middle class due to high housing costs, high taxes, and structurally low salaries.
Maybe someone from Canada or Europe can correct me -- if salaries are so much lower and costs are high, how can someone accumulate enough wealth to accomplish class mobility for themselves or their children?
Don't get me wrong -- I think some things are better in Europe. I think the parliamentary system is mostly better than our winner take all two-party duopoly tire fire, for example.
History and the study of Volksgeists shows that's almost impossible without any major revolutionary event.
The status quo Europeans have had for centuries was their lives being at the mercy of some higher monarchic power, be it emperors, kings, lords, etc, then revolutionary communists, fascists, dictators, etc, and post-WW2 at the mercy of the social welfare state to handle everything for you. There was never a period our relatively recent history where we could just do whatever we wanted, without the ruling powers interfering some way or dictating the rules till the next regime change, and so the Volksgeist inherited and passed on that status quo across generations, kind of like Plato's cave, or like a fish in the water. That's why many Europeans who felt held back or persecuted by the status quo fled to the US decades/centuries ago.
This is totally opposite to the American way of life since 1776 where the state was mostly hands-off to leave you alone and would not help you out, nor get in your way, you'd live or die based on your own individual actions. I realize this is different today for Americans, with the government having way more taxes, regulations and social services than in 1776, but the original Volksgeist around minimalist government, individualism, personal freedom and self-responsibility still prevails.
So people can say "we need to change" all they want, but the reality is that's never gonna happen, Europeans aren't gonna become Americans and Americans aren't gonna become Europeans, the cultural inertia is too powerful, and you can't fight against the stream.
My point is, it can be easy to become economically successful like China when you're a large country with massive human capital and don't give a fuck about democracy, slavery, human abuse and welfare, regulations, etc. and prioritize money at all cost. It's how most empires became empires.
Plenty of business people actually like the high level corruption because it can make doing business easier for them: no red tape, no long wait times, just bribe a some politician and all your paperwork is approved instantly, then it's smooth sailing. That's how China became rich despite corruption.
What you don't want is the Africa style corruption where every single peon and government worker from the top to the bottom, from the president to the policeman on the street, wants a bribe from you every 5 minutes for random reasons they make up. This way nothing ever gets done and the country stays perpetually poor.