We have this thing called "building science" now, you can do better than just copying your grandpa.
We have this thing called "building science" now, you can do better than just copying your grandpa.
I respectfully disagree. There are certainly downsides, and upsides to modern materials (e.g. UPVC), but there are reasons to still use wood in many situations.
From a practical perspective, wood is easy to work, and easy to repair. You can pretty much indefinitely go setting in new pieces of wood where needed (speaking as the owner of a 105 year old wooden boat, which still has ~60pct original material).
Wood is also clean and easy to dispose of, whereas modern materials provide a real headache and hazard.
And IMO nothing compares to wood from an aesthetic perspective, which is important for living spaces.
Well there is a difference between painted & non-painted wood, as far as eco-impact of their disposal goes. Not to mention various anti-rot treatments like used for fencing poles & the like.
But in general you're correct.
> And IMO nothing compares to wood from an aesthetic perspective, which is important for living spaces.
No argument there. Eg. my sister has a kitchen table that's like a 5..6cm thick massive wooden slab. It has a very different quality, look & feel compared to most of today's "fast-fashion" furniture done in cheap, veneered particle board. One way or the other that table will easily outlast her.
Also: unless you live in a damp environment, wood indoors basically lasts forever. True, for window frames etc there exist more durable options today. But it's mostly a matter of cost, maintenance & aesthetics.