This seems like a strange interpretation. If an employee at your company, against policy and likely illegally extracts proprietary data and gives it to hackers in exchange for money you can hardly say that "My company sold it's data".
This seems like a strange interpretation. If an employee at your company, against policy and likely illegally extracts proprietary data and gives it to hackers in exchange for money you can hardly say that "My company sold it's data".
They in turn could go after the perpetrator. If they're using contractors who are cheap, unvetted, untrustworthy or don't carry liability insurance that's their problem and shouldn't excuse them of accountability.
I once applied for a bank position, and they wanted to run a credit check. If you're in a position of handling money, the company has a responsibility to vet its employees. Do I agree with credit checks? Absolutely not, but the point is, Coinbase is partially responsible and that's why they're refunding duped customers.
How far that responsibility goes is up for debate.
When an employee ships a new feature, do you say "My company shipped a new feature?"