I think because it's web-based only, much like Google Docs and the like are. For my Cryptpad replaced Google Docs as a live-collaboration tool.

I'm from the CryptPad Team.

We did not use this sentence. It's the person that posted this that wrote 'Google'

However we believe CryptPad can be part of the solution for both Google and Microsoft

Now the targets are different. Google has most of individuals and B2C. Microsoft is more the larger companies

At this point CryptPad seems to have more tracking on the individual market.

For companies, there are different approches like self-hosting. E2EE in companies is a niche market for which collaborative editing is new.

So 'Google' as an exit-target is probably yo the right goal

While Google is mentioned in some of the user testimonials I don't think the submitter should have added it to the title here.

When cryptpad was first launched, MS Office was very much a desktop product and Google was the web first collaboration platform. That's obviously because (a teeny bit) less true.

Realtime collaborative text editing is afaik something Microsoft is not doing.