Hanlon's razor
Can you point to any of the contracts in the wall of savings that have saved billions of dollars and disagree with any of them? https://doge.gov/savings
Is the argument that government was so efficient before that eliminating these seemingly useful programs was the best and only way to save taxpayer dollars?
Edit: the contract was 3.3B, so that changes the calculus to 1,109,966.78 per child. Haven't seen the facility, but i highly doubt they are staying in million dollar condos, but if they are... there are better ways to do that.
$1,136,436,294.65 for paying their legal services... Why are we paying a billion dollars for legal services of a program we have discontinued?
1,021,000,000 to eradicate polio... Of which that last case in the united states was in 2022... Polio is all but irradicated here in the united states.
We just seem to disagree with what's important and what's wasteful. You could build a brand new city for those amounts in the private sector.
For reference, look up some of the Giga factory costs (With Capital expenditure for production). They are similiar in expenditures.
You can look at the bid requirements yourself and determine whether you think it's reasonable for the scope of the facility: https://sam.gov/opp/3726d9e2246c47e197396e805ce6bb33/view
I also find their J&A unconvincing, and there's no way it passes the smell test required in Far part 6.
There was really no other vendor in the world, besides Family Care to be able to do this? They aren't even a construction company.
That's the crux, for sure. The problem with DOGE though is that instead of creating better ways of doing anything, they just seem to eliminate doing those things at all.
Now we not only don't have a better way of doing a thing that might have been necessary, but we don't even have the sub-optimal way of doing that thing, so now it's not getting done at all.
Edit: Bringing it back to the article, if a person with access to 'a "core financial management system" belonging to the Federal Emergency Management Agency' was foolish enough to let their system get hacked, are we really finding a better way to do things, or are we being a little too careless?
Never heard of the program but on its face that sounds pretty bad. Grift, scam, or just inefficient govt? Not sure but not a good argument for keeping it around!
NYT is a trash media outlet, which obviously leans everything anti-elon.
...maybe your "law" is some ancient eye-for-eye kind of law instead of some modern stuff?
Hanlon's razor was originally a joke. Not a scientific observation how world works, but a funny sentence about there being a lot of incompetence in the world.
(Spanish for _Why not both?_)
uhhh... why are we commiting offensive cyber operations against a nuclear power? Somewhere in your line you seems to think that it's justified? And that biden was doing the right thing by provoking a major power?
Some people just want the world to burn, and when someone puts out the fire, they think that's unamerican?
Maybe because they are doing it too ?
You don't think trump is actively involved in negotations with russia to stop all this madness?
Don't you think that one of the first signs of good faith in negotations would be to stop attacking eachother?
(Though to be fair, every president since Truman has escalated things with Russia/USSR, except maybe Clinton. Reagan just did more than most.)
> You don't think trump is actively involved in negotations[sic] with russia to stop all this madness?
No, I think Trump is doing whatever Putin wants him to do.
And you forgot... besides Trump. because trumps not a warmonger, people like to act like he's on the side of the russians. People have lost their minds.
In the last 3 months, Trump has threatened to invade:
- Greenland - Canada - Mexico - Panama - Cuba
> people like to act like he's on the side of the russians
Trump has said that Ukraine is the one that started the war, and the "deal" he negotiated to end the war excluded Ukraine from the discussion and would give Russia everything it asked for.
> People have lost their minds.
You're right on that point, but its probably not the people you're thinking of.
Also I don't know why we keep referring to Russia as a major power, their GDP is about the size of Italy's, their economy is on the rocks, their military stockpile is depleted from a failed invasion of their much, much smaller neighbor.
Russia didn't punch us in the face, they punched some dude that we barley knew in highschool half way across the world.
Scroll to "Overall control of Ukraine": https://www.warmapper.org/stats
While looking at the chart, keep in mind that Russia currently loses around 30-45k people a month as dead and wounded and they have nothing to show for it. The last major territorial gains were during the first month of the war in March 2022. It's a total military disaster with no end in sight.
And the person you replied to is absolutely right: Russia is not fighting for the potato fields of Ukraine, but to dismantle the entire international security system that the US built after the WWII to secure commerce and influence on the world. Ukraine is one of the stepping stones. Here's the full blueprint: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics#Con...