I've seen this complaint a lot, and I honestly don't get it. I have a feeling it helps LLMs write better code. And removing comments can be done in the reading pass, somewhat forcing you to go through the code line by line and "accept" the code that way. In the grand scheme of things, if this were the only downside to using LLM-based coding agents, I think we've come a long way.
LLMs tend to write comments answering "what?", sometimes to a silly extent. What I found helping for using Claude 3.7 was to add this rule in cursor. The fake xml tag helped to decrease the number of times it strays from my instructions.
<mandatory_code_instruction>
YOU ARE FORBIDDEN FROM ADDING ANY COMMENTS OR DOCSTRINGS. The only code accepted will be self-documenting code.
</mandatory_code_instruction>
If there's a section of code where a comment answering "why?" is needed this rule doesn't seem to interfere when I explicitly ask it to add it there.