Comment by joshjob42 | Hacker News Reader

Comment by joshjob42 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Is Coalton compatible broadly compatible with the features of CIEL? I've been interested in getting into CL, and CIEL seems like a very nice batteries-included way to do that. But Coalton is also quite interesting and brings some features that may be useful. But I'm such a novice in this particular space (I'm mostly a Julia user with Python and some elisp) that I can't quite tell. Obviously I could start learning CL using CIEL and later play with Coalton but was just wondering if you knew how they may play together.

Coalton can be used wherever (almost any) Common Lisp can be used: mixed in, side by side, exclusively, as an library, etc.

CIEL doesn't presently ship any native Coalton interfaces, so all invocations of CIEL within Coalton code would have to be in a "lisp" form, which is like Rust's "unsafe".

    (define (some-coalton-function arg)
      ;; break out to Lisp
      (lisp String (arg)
        ...CIEL stuff here...))

On ordinary safety settings, the String declaration on the Lisp code will be checked at runtime so that wrong types don't leak back into the surrounding/calling Coalton code.

Conversely, Coalton code can be freely used within Common Lisp code regardless of whether it uses CIEL.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com