Ok, but what do you need AI for? The two random topics don't seem very connected, they could just be random links (or backlinks) from the page. The potential is definitely there, but the execution could be improved.
You can also go to this page that happens to have links to every date page and you can clearly see that it's not picking anything related to the article contents as most of the time it just picks a random date rather than one of the related topics: https://wikidive.tulv.in/dive?topic=List_of_non-standard_dat...
I don't know why the creator doesn't just say that it's random instead of making an easily falsifiable claim that it's "AI-guided".
"I was going in this rabbit hole of wikipedia articles: #{chain} \n I have now found these topics:\n\n#{related_topics}\n\n Select the 2 most mind blowing topics from the list and that I'd enjoy given my rabbit hole. Ensure two topics are not the same."
and pics two articles that it returns. This is slightly better than random.(related article names are obtained from wikipedia API).
Right now, I'm maxed on daily Groq usage and the app falls back to pure random choice.
Why two articles? I was kind of going for a hot or not style system.
Anyway, it was a fun experiment. Learned lots.