Hacker News Reader

Presumably it's at least worth considering if such a pessimistic attitude is warranted. Such a slow oxidation rate is certainly not warranted on a chemical process level. The trick is performing this chemical process 1.5 AU away.

View on HN

Absolutely, don't mistake my cynicism for defeatism. I want it as badly as anyone else, but the chemical and thermodynamic makeup of Mars does not warrant optimism (given present knowledge).

Bezos's vision is better than Musk's. This plan to gravitationally disrupt Ceres and turn 100% of it into habitat strictly dominates all other space colonization ideas in our solar system not least that it can provide more square feet of habitat than Earth does but probably not the 0.2 km^3 of ocean per person or the 0.7 million tons of atmosphere per person that we have, areas where Biosphere 2 fell tragically short. [1]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.07487

[1] CO2 levels swung violently from day to night in Biosphere 2 because they didn't have enough atmosphere relative to plants and animals; Biosphere 2 probably shouldn't have tried to simulate oceans at all

Reply on news.ycombinator.com