Real ID now required in US after nearly 20 years of delays
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
In particular, a passport remains the ultimate form of ID, usable for anything.
[1] https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/identification
There is currently another topic under discussion that is very local to Arizona, involving a court case there, yet the conversation has coalesced around a thread from theguardian.com, which is a UK news outlet.
Why are we letting foreign entities tell us what our local news is? This here article is ostensibly about travel within the U.S., from one state to another, because that's the major change with Real ID, yet again we're looking at a foreign entity's news article about it.
Why can't we use news articles that are most germane to the topic under discussion? The "AZ Road Rage" topic had someone posting a perfectly good link to ABC 15 News, which should be a local authority on the topic; I don't see why we needed to pivot outside the U.S. to The Guardian at all.
Is it not the system working as designed?
You might be interested to know that the UK publication The Economist tries to have non-UK reporters covering the UK, and non-US reporters covering the US. The idea being that non-local reporters are both more neutral and have a wider perspective to bring.
The Guardian is one of the world's top newspapers, along with the New York Times, Le Monde, etc.
HN is international. And honestly I'll take reporting from The Guardian over a local ABC 15 affiliate any day. This is a national story. A random local affiliate has less resources to report the story, not more.
It just makes it sound like all of the government and international identification us citizens carry isn't real enough. What a dumb name.
What the government should do, is hire some xooglers to help with naming so in the future when Real ID is deprecated, they could transition to come up with some even better names like “Real ID (Official). Or they could launch a competing ID and use the same or similar name and then sunset one of them. That would be good.