>What change do you want to see here?
Licensing, liability, and enforceable standards for safety critical code that interfaces with the public would be a good start.
Licensing, liability, and enforceable standards for safety critical code that interfaces with the public would be a good start.
Just look at the diverse and haphazard way AI has been used in autonomous driving. I would argue it’s a misplacement of the “move fast and break things” (in some cases at least) that has no place in public-facing safety critical applications.
It brings up some difficult questions regarding adequacy of testing at the very least when the underpinnings are not very interpretable.
Using LLMs or other ML as components in systems themselves is a whole other thing, and I agree with you wholeheartedly.