They had to after a tweet floated around of a mentally ill person who had expressed psychotic thoughts to the AI. They said they were going off their meds and GPT 4o agreed and encouraged them to do so. Oops.
The sychophant will be back because they accidentally stumbled upon an engagement manager's dream machine.
Throwing out strawman hypotheticals is just going to confuse the public debate over what protections need to be prioritized.
Seems like asserting hypothetical "significant protections to address exactly this class of issue" does the same thing though?
As more people adopted Google, it became more popularity oriented.
Personally I pay more not to be bs-d, but I know many people who prefer to be lied to, and I expect this part of the personalization in the future.
"I asked ChatGPT if <current_event> could be caused by <crackpot theory>." and it confirmed everything!
Perhaps everyone there is LARPing - but if you start typing stereotypical psychosis talk into ChatGPT, it won't be long before it starts agreeing with your divinity.
https://m.economictimes.com/magazines/panache/reddit-faked-i...