Mugshots are typically available to the public anyway. I think they traded easier access to mugshots.
Technically, in 1960, you could pay a huge number of people to listen to a huge number of telephones or watch a huge number of cameras, but it was so insanely expensive that unless you were in East Germany or Moscow it wasn't a threat you had to consider.
Cheap cameras and cheap hard drives and LLM vision processing models which mean that you can have a permanent archive of every license plate or face that went by a location mean that things are very different and even though things were legally possible before, it's a totally different problem now.
Certainly hope they would still overrule that too... but drawing a bright line somewhere between "scales really cheaply due to technology" and "scales more expensively due to human labor" is such a fascinating and critical problem to solve in the era we live in now.
Just to be clear: having a mugshot does not mean you're a criminal. It means the person was arrested, not convicted (charged with a crime). I'm not finding good statistics but other data makes it seem reasonably high. Even if very low it would still violate the spirit of "innocent until proven guilty"