Should the people who had the most ability to prevent a global nuclear war be survivors of one?
That seems like a misalignment of incentives.
That seems like a misalignment of incentives.
They need to have as much skin in the game as everyone else.
The point is that for deterrence to work, it has to be credible. If Russia thought it could “kill” the US government so that no one would be able to effectively order a counterattack (either because they are dead or because they can’t communicate orders to actual nuclear forces), would they do it?