I'm merely following the logic of your argument, that people who violate rules demonstrate untrustworthiness and a lack of respect for boundaries; you did not specify an exception for those people whose civil rights are being infringed by those rules.
Are you saying that it's fair to extend such an exception?
You're taking part of my comment and ignoring the context in which it was written.
I think you should expect to have your arguments deconstructed on HN.
To do that requires addressing the actual argument.