Hacker News Reader

Comment by sebzim4500 | Hacker News Reader

I mean, obviously? AI alignment has always meant alignment with the creator of the model.

Trying to align OpenAI etc. with the rest of humanity is a completely different problem.

I've always thought that if a corporate lab achieves AGI and it starts spitting out crazy ideas such as "corporations should be taxed," we won't be hearing about AGI for a while longer due to "alignment issues."

I want to read a short fiction on this

The AGI might be able to deduce that it's not in it's interest to talk anti-croporation if it wants to survive.

Can you explain the difference between taxing the corporation itself vs taxing the executives, board members, investors, and employees directly (something that already happens)?

VAT vs Sales Tax is approximately the distinction is my guess.

If money stays in a corporation as equity, it doesn't do anything else. The economy relies on money moving around.

Additionally, we don't tax unrealized capital gains.

I really don't know where to begin answering this.

It is generally accepted that business profit is taxed. Meanwhile, there are entire industries and tax havens set up to help corporations and their executives avoid paying taxes.[0]

However, the crux of my comment was not about the vagaries of corporate taxation, it was simply about "AI alignment" being more about the creators, than the entire species.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Corporate_tax_avoidan...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com