"Unfortunately, no scientifically rigorous evidence supports the claims of pre-K’s impact on middle-class children. James Heckman, a University of Chicago Nobel laureate in economics, is one of the strongest voices in favor of early education for low-income children, but here is what he says about applying the model to the middle class: 'Advocates and supporters of universal preschool often use existing research for purely political purposes. But the solid evidence for the effectiveness of early interventions is limited to those conducted on disadvantaged populations.' As Bruce Fuller, an education professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of Standardized Childhood (2007), explains, 'For middle-class kids the quality of preschool centers would have to approach a nirvana-like condition to present radically richer environments than the majority of middle-class homes, or home-based caregivers.'"
Pre-K just sounds like adding another inadequate piece to the already crumbling K-12 system.
Just focus on K-12, heck, just focus on high school, and make it really good. One thing at a time.