The document lays claim to "Java, OS and OO" as Apple innovations?
We -- at best -- stand on giants' shoulders. Making the facile argument that Samsung got stuff from Apple just like Apple got stuff from Xerox is skipping over very important details.
It meant some of the implementations of those rely on Apple innovations i.e. patents. Which given how old Apple is, all of the patent acquisitions along the way and some pretty innovative work by NeXT it isn't inconceivable.
Doesn't mean that those patents will be enforceable.